Legal Opinion

Starling v. St. Paul Plow-Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

This is a suit for a breach of contract. The plaintiff is a citizen of Nebraska, and the defendant of the state of Minnesota. The defendant is a naked licensee of apatent, (No. 154,293, dated August 18, 1874,) under a contract executed December 17, 1877, by which it is permitted to'manufacture and sell the Starling sulky-plow in the following territory, viz.: “Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Dakota, and all that part of Iowa north of the Northwestern Railway, and all that territory west and north of the above-described territory.” A royalty of §2.50 per plow was exacted to be paid on accounts…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dall Motor Parts Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Smith v. The Wm. J. LipsettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API