Legal Opinion

Walter v. Police & Fire Pension Commission of Trenton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 5, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

Does a police officer, who continues in service after having served twenty years and after having attained the age of fifty years, forfeit his right to a pension under 2 Rev. Stat. 43:16-1 (Pamph. L. 1920, ch. 160, p. 324), by reason of his conviction for malfeasance in office, the malfeasance having occurred after the police officer had become eligible for the pension ? We think so.

On January 6th, 1904, prosecutor was appointed to the police department of the city of Trenton. On the 25th day of Eebruary, 1930, he had attained the age of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plunkett v. Board of Pension CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Bader v. CroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. State v. WalterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. State, ex rel. Mulsoff v. SloatSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fox v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ballurio v. CastelliniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Talbott v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. Mount v. Trustees of Pub. Emp. Retirement Syst.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API