Legal Opinion

Donald Kramer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 24, 1963No. 17293PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant and his co-defendant Dewdney were jointly indicted and tried for housebreaking, Section 22-1801, D.C. Code. Dewdney was convicted and did not appeal. Appellant, also convicted on circumstantial and hearsay evidence, brings this appeal. From the circumstantial evidence the jury, although by no means obliged to do so, could have found that appellant acted as a lookout for Dewdney, who entered the premises, and was accordingly an accessory liable as a principal under Section 22-105.1 The circumstantial evidence included testimony that appellant was seen walking back…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. Kenneth C. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Posey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. David R. Jones v. United States of America, Willie L. Short, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur L. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Carpenter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Harold W. Greenwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API