Legal Opinion

Tilo Roofing Co. v. Iskin

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 8, 1945Published

1Opinion of the CourtRowe, J.

This is an action to recover according to the tenor of a promissory note. The question is as to whether the note is to be considered as an ordinary note or as a sealed- instrument. The defense is 'the- statute of limitations' which would apply unless the note is to be considered as being under seal. The defendant pleaded this statute and the trial judge- found that the note was “not -a sealed instrument as provided by law, -there being no recital that the instrument was sealed or bore the seal of the person signing the same, or that the- instrument was intended to talc-e effect as a sealed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alfano v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Capitol Amusement Co. v. GallagherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Glendale Coal Co. v. NessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Master Bakers Supply, Inc. v. Hopkins, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API