Tilo Roofing Co. v. Iskin
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtRowe, J.
This is an action to recover according to the tenor of a promissory note. The question is as to whether the note is to be considered as an ordinary note or as a sealed- instrument. The defense is 'the- statute of limitations' which would apply unless the note is to be considered as being under seal. The defendant pleaded this statute and the trial judge- found that the note was “not -a sealed instrument as provided by law, -there being no recital that the instrument was sealed or bore the seal of the person signing the same, or that the- instrument was intended to talc-e effect as a sealed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alfano v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Capitol Amusement Co. v. GallagherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Glendale Coal Co. v. NessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Master Bakers Supply, Inc. v. Hopkins, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938