Whitaker v. Kruse
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Presiding Judge.
Dorothy L. Whitaker appeals a jury verdict in favor of George Kruse and Progressive Construction and Engineering Co., Inc. Whitaker raises four issues on appeal. We address only the following issue since it is dispositive:
Was it reversible error for the trial court to give defendants' tendered jury instruction number 4 which states:
I instruct you, members of the jury, that plaintiffs seek recovery for medical expense, care and treatment which they contend was necessitated by the accident of April 4, 1978. In order for plaintiffs to recover for such medical expense, care…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
- Standard Oil Co. v. BowkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Goshen v. EnglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Zimmerman v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boehmer v. BoggianoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Danko v. ConyersColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Brownell v. FigelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Progressive Construction & Engineering Co. v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hassan v. BegleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.