Legal Opinion

Murtha v. Murphy

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion (1) to dismiss the complaint for failing to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and (2) to vacate a notice of lien filed on July 9, 1956.

The action is to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The complaint alleges that from May, 1956 to June 26, 1956 the plaintiffs, pursuant to an agreement with one Fred Brendel, furnished certain materials for the erection of a building on the defendant’s property. Fred Brendel was under contract with the defendant to provide the materials and construct the building. The plaintiffs were paid $1,000, but a balance of $735.16 is due on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lycee Francais v. CalagnaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Long Beach Terrace, Inc. v. Mallis Wood Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Lo Forte v. OmelNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API