Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Lane County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1989No. CC 16-87-00752; CA A44047; SC S35387, S35492Published

1Opinion of the Court

771 P.2d 254 (1989)

307 Or. 534

In the matter of the Legality of an Intergovernmental Agreement between Lane County and the City of Eugene Regarding Certain Improvements to the Eugene Municipal Airport.

William R. ROGERS, Jr., Respondent On Review,

v.

LANE COUNTY and City of Eugene, Petitioners On Review.

CC 16-87-00752; CA A44047; SC S35387; S35492.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted November 1, 1988.

Decided March 21, 1989.

Reconsideration Denied May 2, 1989.

Timothy J. Sercombe, of Harrang, Long, Watkinson & Arnold, P.C., Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner on review City of Eugene.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel Sprague v. StraubOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel Chapman v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rogers v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Alexander v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Rogers v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API