Legal Opinion

Arlotto v. Hauck Realty Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 25, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLloyd, J.

Plaintiff below brought an action of replevin to recover four boilers and four ranges sold to Emma G. Lembo under a conditional sales contract, she being the owner of *306the house in which they were placed. The defendant at the time was the holder of a mortgage which was in process of foreclosure. It subsequently became the purchaser of the property and it was in this capacity that it became the defendant in the present action. Judgment was given for the defendant in the District Court and the plaintiff appeals, contending that under the evidence judgment should have been rendered in his favor.

By…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sellitto v. Heating and Plumbing Finance Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Uttinger v. KoopmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Keil Motor Co. v. Home Owners Loan Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API