Legal Opinion

State v. McNeil

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 2001No. Appeal No. C-000808, Trial No. B-0005249PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.

Maintaining that the trial court abused its discretion, defendant-appellant, Donelle McNeil, challenges the denial of his presentence motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to a charge of aggravated robbery, which included a firearm specification. Concluding that the court properly exercised its discretion, we overrule McNeil’s assignment of error.

McNeil was indicted for aggravated robbery, with a firearm specification, in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1), and robbery, in violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(2). McNeil entered a plea of not guilty to both counts and filed a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. XieOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. PeterseimOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. FishOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. Howard, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Scioto County2017
  2. State v. BarnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. McComb, 22570 (1-23-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. ConleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API