Legal Opinion

Robair v. Penrod Drilling Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1998No. 98-CA-0222PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JiSCHOTT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, a seaman, is seeking benefits for maintenance and cure and damages under the Jones Act against defendants, Penrod Drilling Corporation, General Atlantic Resources, Inc. and Universal Ogden Services. After leaving the vessel where he was employed and after being taken to the dock, he was walking on the highway toward home when an automobile struck him. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing his case. The issue is whether under the undisputed facts of the case, he is entitled to recover as a matter of law. We affirm. ■

Universal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Braen v. Pfeifer Oil Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Florida Fuels, Inc. v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Gabriel Vincent v. Harvey Well ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. James J. Sellers v. Dixilyn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Judith Barbara Williamson v. Western Pacific Dredging Corp., Judith Barbara Williamson v. Western Pacific Dredging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blanda v. Kathryn Rae Towing, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API