Legal Opinion
Succession of Reynolds
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 5, 1956No. 42925PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment maintaining exceptions of no right and no cause of action and a plea of res adjudicata. An appeal was also taken by the curator ad hoc (representing one of the absent heirs) to the judgment of the district court fixing his fee and taxing it as costs to be paid by Mrs. Edna Reynolds Reese and the Reynolds’ heirs who are joined in their claim with Mrs. Reese.
This controversy has been before this court on two prior occasions. See Succession of Reynolds, 224 La. 975, 71 So.2d 537 and Succession of Reynolds, 228 La. 640, 83 So.2d 885. In the first…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Quarles v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Succession of ReynoldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Bowie v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Succession of Pujol v. ManningSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Rosenthal v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mitchell v. BertollaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Perkins v. SCAFFOLDING RENTAL & ERECTION SERVICESupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Grain Dealers Mut. Ins. Co. v. HARDWARE D. MUT. FI CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Maher v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
- Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.