Legal Opinion

Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. Judge

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

Twenty-two gas and electric companies (Petitioners) have filed in this Court’s original jurisdiction individual petitions for review which have been consolidated (Petitions), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to declare invalid certain portions of the Public Utility Realty Tax Act (PUR-TA) 1 and seeking monetary relief from being required to pay a supplemental additional PURTA tax assessment (Suptax). One of the twenty-two petitioners, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Allegheny Coop), makes the additional allegation in its Petition that PURTA does not apply to it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dorfman v. Pennsylvania Social Services Union-Local 668 of the Service Employees International UnionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. West Penn Power Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. West Penn Power Co. v. CohenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Ohio Edison Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. FajtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. WilliamsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Adams Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. ADAMS ELEC. CO-OP., INC. v. Com.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API