Fry v. Platt.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Woodson District Cowrt. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the facts. Trial at the October Term, 1883, and judgment for defendant Platt. The plaintiff Fry brings the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
*63The opinion of the court was delivered, by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by James B. Fry against Alexander Platt, to specifically enforce the performance of a contract alleged to have'been entered into between the parties for the purchase and sale of a certain piece of land in Woodson county, Kansas. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, and the plaintiff, as plaintiff in error, now brings the case to this court. The plaintiff’s petition in the court below states in substance that the defendant owned section 1, township 25, range 14, in Woodson…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grafton v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Riley v. FarnsworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Holmes v. EvansMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
- Bain v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Minturn v. BaylisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ringer v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Reigart v. Manufacturers Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Walker v. IretonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Witt v. BootheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Conroy v. WoodcockSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.