Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Brannelly

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff, who claims to be assignee of a mortgage and to have made a peaceable entry to foreclose, G. L. c. 244, §§ 1, 2, and thus to have acquired possession, seeks by recourse to the summary process for the possession of land, G. L. c. 239, to recover actual possession of the mortgaged premises. The writ was dated May 15, 1923. The case was tried upon agreed facts. After a verdict had *552been rendered by direction for the defendant, it is before us upon a report, with a stipulation that, if there was error, judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff, otherwise to be entered on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Warren v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Boyle v. BoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Walker v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Woodside v. RidgewayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cummings v. WajdaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Realty Developing Co. v. Wakefield Ready-Mixed Concrete Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Sheehan Construction Co. v. DudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Barry v. DudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Altobelli v. MontesiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API