Legal Opinion

Salmon v. First National Bank of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 3, 1940:

Fairchild, J.

The question here presented is: Does sec. 325.16, Stats., in any of its provisions compel the ruling that Peter Kneeland cannot testify concerning a conversation between Margaret Salmon and William Kneeland, deceased, on February 27, 1938? Upon the trial his testimony was taken subject to objection and the ruling thereon was reserved until after the verdict was returned. At that time the trial court stated its conclusion “that Peter Kneeland’s testimony, though credible (as found by the jury), is not competent, as a matter of law,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. CulbertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Holway v. SanbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lauburg v. IhmigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Will of PullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Fonk's Mobile Home Park & Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API