Legal Opinion

Steinichen v. Stancil

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 18, 2006No. S06A0918PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Chief Justice.

In this quiet title action, the appellant, Karen Steinichen, did not file any exceptions to the special master’s report before the trial court entered its judgment adopting the report. Steinichen subsequently moved for a new trial, contending that the evidence did not support the trial court’s judgment. In denying Steinichen’s motion for new trial, the trial court ruled that Steinichen had waived her right to object to the special master’s report and the trial court’s judgment by failing to object to the report before the trial court adopted it. On appeal, Steinichen…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milk v. Total Pay and HR Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Higdon v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Wiggins v. City of MacOnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Eardley v. McGreevySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  5. Sims v. City of ToccoaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nelson v. GEORGIA SHERIFFS YOUTH HOMES, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. MPP Investments, Inc. v. Cherokee Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. La Chona, LLC v. AberraSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. Republic Title Co. v. Freeport Title & Guaranty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Johnson v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API