D.A.S. v. People

In this appeal, D.A.S. (the mother) contends that the court of appeals erred in affirming the judgment of the juvenile court which terminated her parental-relationship with her children (O.J.S., A.S.S77 and D.A.S., Jr. (Jr.)).1 The mother argues that reversal is necessary because the testimony of a psychologist and his report were admitted into evidence at the termination hearing in violation of the attorney-client privilege. ■ We affirm.

I

On April 29, 1987, the Colorado Department of Social Services (department) filed a dependent or neglected children petition with the City and County of…