Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Lane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Calendar 36,207PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Three circuit judges, sitting en banc, heard evidence in support of charges preferred by the attorney general against defendant, found him guilty of unprofessional conduct as an attorney at law, and suspended him from practice for the period of three years. Defendant reviews by appeal.

The nature of the review herein, under the statute and court rules, whether in the nature of certiorari or a hearing* de novo, must first be determined. Defendant and the attorney general both contend that the review here is de novo. We do not so hold.

Court Buie No. 55, effective January 1, 1931, provides :

“Every…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Attorney General v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. StanleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lipton v. BoeskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Magee v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API