Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Harwood

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1875PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Stark county; the Hon. J. W. Cochran, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

This was an action on the case, brought by appellee against appellant, to recover for causing the death of her husband at a highway crossing, through the alleged negligence of appellant’s servants in charge of a freight train running on the railroad of the appellant, on the 17th of August, 1874. The plaintiff below recovered a verdict and judgment, and the defendant appealed.

This judgment must be reversed for error in giving and refusing instructions.

The court below gave to the jury the following instruction for the plaintiff:

‘•The jury are instructed that, under the laws of this State, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. BachesIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. PayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OrrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Dyson v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. GilbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Emery v. GinnanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  5. James v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API