People v. Sigal
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Appeal from conviction of second degree murder. Once more an appellate court is requested to weigh admissibility of a confession to an unwitnessed murder against claims of police coercion used in producing the confession. Evidentiary use of an involuntary confession is a denial of due process of law, violating both federal and state Constitutions and requiring reversal of the conviction, even in the presence of independent corroborating evidence of guilt. {Lynumn v. Illinois, 372 U.S. 528 [83 S.Ct. 917, 9 L.Ed.2d 922]; Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568, 583-584 [81 S.Ct. 1860, 6 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. StoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. SigalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- In Re SchletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.