Legal Opinion

People v. Sigal

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1963No. Crim. 3426PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Appeal from conviction of second degree murder. Once more an appellate court is requested to weigh admissibility of a confession to an unwitnessed murder against claims of police coercion used in producing the confession. Evidentiary use of an involuntary confession is a denial of due process of law, violating both federal and state Constitutions and requiring reversal of the conviction, even in the presence of independent corroborating evidence of guilt. {Lynumn v. Illinois, 372 U.S. 528 [83 S.Ct. 917, 9 L.Ed.2d 922]; Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568, 583-584 [81 S.Ct. 1860, 6 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. StoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. SigalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. In Re SchletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API