Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Johnson v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. 18S00-9412-CR-01157Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Justice

I would not reach the issue of whether Richard Reed’s prior representation of Hiatt required disqualification in this case. Defendant did not invoke the special prosecutor statute, Ind.Code § 33-14-1-6, or otherwise seek the disqualification of the prosecutor. As such, the issue is waived on appeal, Hubbard v. State, 518 N.E.2d 782, 784 (Ind.1988), unless a claim of fundamental error or ineffective assistance of counsel can be established. I find no basis for an ineffective assistance claim in that sound strategic considerations can easily be envisioned to support defense counsel’s decision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hubbard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API