Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided November 2, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Reynolds,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. Are the current and future pension payments made by theState retirement systems to retirees actual or moral obligationsof the State of Oklahoma? 2. If the Oklahoma Legislature increases benefits in the stateretirement systems without increasing funding to pay for theenhanced benefits, are such actions subject to the debtlimitations of Article X, Section 23 of the OklahomaConstitution? 3. If the Oklahoma Legislature increases…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Baker v. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API