Legal Opinion

Braasch v. Mandel

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 14, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Justice:

This is an opinion on a motion to dismiss an appeal taken from two orders of the Vice Chancellor entered in the above cause.

Herbert Braasch, a stockholder of Mandel Brothers, Inc. (hereinafter Mandel), filed a derivative action on behalf of himself and other stockholders against certain officers and directors of Mandel.

The complaint alleged that in August, 1960, Mandel sold all its assets to Weiboldt Stores, Inc. (hereafter Weiboldt), in exchange for stock of Weiboldt which under the plan was to be distributed pro rata to Mandel’s stockholders. Following the distribution of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manahan v. Petroleum Producing & Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Montez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  3. Senne v. ConleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
  5. Lenhart v. Lenhart Wagon Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  2. Lipton v. News International, PlcSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Matter of Various Water Rights in Lake DeSmetWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Town of Southbury v. American Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Groesbeck v. SotireConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API