Legal Opinion

Vintson v. Lichtenberg

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 2002No. A02A0478Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Gene Vintson d/b/a Vintson Construction Company (‘Vintson”) and Richard and Peggy Lichtenberg entered into a contract for Vintson to build a home for the Lichtenbergs. After completing the home, Vintson sued the Lichtenbergs, alleging that they had failed to pay him for additional work he performed that was not covered by the original contract price. The trial court granted the Lichtenbergs partial summary judgment on Vintson’s claims, and Vintson appealed. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Balest v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. White v. CauthenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API