Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elmhurst Group v. Board of Property Assessment Appeals & Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 2011No. 2258 C.D. 2009Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that, where property is subject to a long-term commercial lease, the value of the property for tax purposes depends on whether the taxpayer is the owner or the lessee of the property. For the following reasons, I cannot agree that the identity of the taxpayer dictates a property’s value for tax purposes.

In re Appeal of Marple Springfield Center, Inc., 530 Pa. 122, 125, 607 A.2d 708, 709 (1992) (emphasis added), our Supreme Court stated:

The statutory foundation for tax assessments is ... fail' market value:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of Marple Springfield Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Tech One Associates v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API