Legal Opinion

Mintz & Gold LLP v. Daibes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 2015No. 14220 104699/11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered on or about December 19, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on its account stated claim, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it entered into a retainer agreement with defendant and sent him regular invoices pursuant to that agreement, to which he did not object…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Darby & Darby, P. C. v. VSI International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Morris v. Astor Holdings Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Bartning v. BartningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Lapidus & Associates, LLP v. Elizabeth Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Jaffe v. Brown-JaffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Unisol, Inc. v. KidronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. An-Jung v. Rower LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API