Legal Opinion

John Dillard v. Baldwin County Commissioners

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 8, 2000No. 99-12251Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARCUS, Circuit Judge:

Intervenors Dale Eugene Brown, George R. Johnson, James Austin, Jr., and Alvin Lee Pitts (the “Intervenors”) appeal the district court’s order granting the original Plaintiffs’ (the “Dillard Plaintiffs”) motion to dismiss the Intervenors’ complaint. The Intervenors sought to intervene as plaintiffs in order to challenge the district court’s 1988 remedial order which changed the size of the Baldwin County Commission from four commissioners to seven in order to remedy a violation of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The district court dismissed the Intervenors’…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API