Legal Opinion

Clark v. Rosenblum

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 12, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01667Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON IAN LEONARD CLARK, Case No. 3:23-cv-01667-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Ellen F. Rosenblum’s (the “Attorney General”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Ian Clark’s (“Clark”) complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Edward G. Eldridge v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API