Education Logistics, Inc. v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.
Following the jury’s award of $28.4 million, Laidlaw moves for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, and to amend the judgment. When jury instructions were settled, I submitted the full panoply of damage instructions with the caveat that I would consider the consequential damages argument anew, if it appeared such damages were part of the verdict. A *1041hearing was held on the pending motions on March 13, 2013. Having considered the arguments, Laidlaw’s motion is granted in part. The jury award is reduced because the jury awarded consequential damages, damages…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Moses v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Alfonso Avitia, and Diane Larsen v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.