Legal Opinion

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. v. LINDA PURDO ENOCHS

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 2017No. 4D16-2025PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.

In this Engle 1 progeny case, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Philip Morris USA, Inc. (“Defendants”) appeal the final judgment entered in favor of Linda Purdo Enochs as Representative of the estate of her deceased husband, Thomas Purdo (“Plaintiff’). Defendants argue that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to engage in the requisite genuineness analysis in granting Plaintiffs peremptory challenges to two prospective jurors; (2) misapplying the Melbourne analysis in granting Plaintiffs peremptory challenges as to two other prospective jurors; (3) allowing Plaintiff to misstate the law on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Melbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GEOVANI JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. GEOVANI JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. LESLIE SCHLEFSTEIN, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF DAWN SCHLEFSTEINDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API