Legal Opinion
Emily Snead v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation James McIntosh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2001No. 99-35071Published
1Opinion of the Court
237 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2001)
EMILY SNEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; JAMES MCINTOSH, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 99-35071
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted May 4, 2000
Filed January 23, 2001
[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Scott N. Hunt, Esq., Busse & Hunt, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Andrew M. Altschul, Esq., Stoel Rives, Portland, Oregon, for the defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.