Legal Opinion

In re Wise

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided December 14, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcKENNA, Circuit Judge

(orally). This case involves the consideration of the tariff act of 1890. It is contended by the collector of the port that the merchandise in question comes under section 1, par. 323, of the tariff bill of 1890, which reads as follows: “Starch, including all preparations, from whatever substance produced, fit for use as starch, two cents per pound.” The importer contends that it comes under section 2, par. 730, which reads: “Tapioca, cassava, or cassada, free.” The case is an extremely doubtful one. If the words in paragraph 323, “'fit for use as starch,” mean physically fit, if I may use…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
  2. Chung Yune v. KellyUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
  3. Heller v. MagoneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wise v. Chew Hing LungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API