Legal Opinion

911 Alwyn Owners Corp. v. Rosenthal

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Beverly S. Cohen, J.

Second-party plaintiff David C. Walentas (Walentas) moves for (1) an order, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing defendants’ first counterclaim for a declaratory judgment regarding defendants’ right to succeed to the rent control rights previously held by Lee Rosenthal, deceased; (2) an order, pursuant *829to CPLR 3025 (b), granting leave to add to the complaint an eviction cause of action, and for summary judgment on that claim; and (3) summary judgment on his right to use and occupancy rent for the period November 1, 1987 through October 31, 1990. Regarding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. East Asiatic Co. v. CorashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. 829 Seventh Avenue Co. v. ReiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. 911 Alwyn Owners Corp. v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox v. J.D. Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Vartarian v. BradyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API