Legal Opinion

Spooner v. Armour-Dial

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 1985No. 84—253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

Plaintiffs, Charles and Clara Spooner, filed a five-count complaint, later amended and supplemented, against defendants, Armour-Dial, Inc., and four of its supervisory employees, seeking damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, count I, tortious interference with occupation, count II, libel and slander, count III, bailment, count IV, and loss of consortium, count V, arising out of Charles Spooner’s employment by defendant, Armour-Dial. This appeal is from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all counts.

Plaintiffs raise two issues on appeal: (1) whether…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Midgett v. Sackett-Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Cook v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 308 v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API