Coles v. Collector of Customs for Port of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
App'eal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court (93 Fed. 954) sustaining the decision of the board of United States general appraisers that a cargo of anthracite coal imported from Wales into the port of San Francisco, Cal., which contained “less than ninety-two per centum of fixed carbon,” was subject to duty at the rate of 67 cents per ton, as provided by paragraph 415 of the act of July 24, 1897, entitled “An act to provide revenue for the government, and to encourage the industries of the United States” (30 Stat. 151-190), commonly known as the “Dingley…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smythe v. FiskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Greenleaf v. GoodrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Movius v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Solomon v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- In re ColesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Shallus v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1907
- Evans v. Collector of Customs of Port of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Perkins Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910