Legal Opinion

St. L., S. F. T. Ry. v. R. O. C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellee, plaintiff in the court below, in its petition alleges that from September, 1906, to April, 1907, appellant and its connecting lines had in effect a tariff, which permitted concentration of baled cotton originating in the Indian Territory, at Sherman, Texas, and obligating itself to refund or pay to the shipper, upon reshipment of the cotton, the amount that had been paid for the shipment thereof from the Indian Territory points to Sherman, this arrangement being what is commonly called "concentration" or "compress privileges;" that plaintiff and its assignor, under this tariff,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. F. A. Piper Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. White Provision Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Works v. Southern Pacific Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Federal Gravel Co. v. Detroit & MacKinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. W. L. Shepherd Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API