Legal Opinion

D'AMICO v. Blanck

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 2, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

85 N.J. Super. 297 (1964)

204 A.2d 609

HARRY R. D'AMICO AND CATHERINE D'AMICO, TRADING AS D'AMICO LIQUOR STORE, APPELLANTS,

v.

HORACE W. BLANCK, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 26, 1964.

Decided November 2, 1964.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, SULLIVAN and LABRECQUE.

Mr. Norman Heine argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Samuel P. Orlando, attorney).

Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Richman, Berry & Ferren, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel B. Helfand, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the Division of Alcoholic…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Mazza v. CavicchiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merry Heart Nurs. & Conv. Home v. DoughertyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. In Re Application of Howard Savings Bk.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Tibbs v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of FranklinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Moiseyev v. NEW JERSEY RACING COM'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API