Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 18, 1987No. 86-117PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Having carefully read and considered the record and briefs of counsel, we conclude that the writ is due to be quashed. However, we do not agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals, 516 So.2d 818 that a defendant must make a showing that a desired witness is “willing to testify” before he is entitled to a continuance. It is true that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Uptain, 531 F.2d 1281, 1287 (5th Cir.1976), stated that a movant for a continuance must show, inter alia, that the desired witness is “willing to testify.” However, that language is conspicuously absent in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Terry Ray UptainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Howard L. Dickerson v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Lochli v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Holton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Crum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API