Legal Opinion

State of Ohio v. Charles E. Wright, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1993No. 91-3615Published

1Opinion of the Court

992 F.2d 616

61 USLW 2680

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Charles E. WRIGHT, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-3615.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Reargued Dec. 9, 1992.

Decided April 30, 1993.

David C. Greer (argued and briefed), Bieser, Greer & Landis, Dayton, OH, for plaintiff-appellee.

Jeffery W. Clark, Office of the Attorney General of Ohio, Deborah P. O'Neill (argued and briefed), Columbus, OH for defendant-appellant.

Sean Connelly (argued and briefed), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, amicus curiae U.S.

David C. Greer, Bieser, Greer & Landis,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Jones; Concurrence · Nelson; Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API