Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Peters

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1983No. 8214SC754PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

I

In this medical negligence action, plaintiff, David Wayne Dixon, sued Dr. Calvin R. Peters, who performed a hair transplant procedure on the plaintiff, and Duke University, where the procedure was performed. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, Duke University was granted a directed verdict. At the close of all the evidence, plaintiff, having tried the case on an informed consent theory, consented to the entering of a directed verdict in Dr. Peters’ favor on the issue of operative negligence. The question involving “informed consent” was submitted to the jury, and the jury…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ashe v. Radiation Oncology AssociatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Clark v. Sanger Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Crawford v. FayezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API