Dixon v. Peters
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
I
In this medical negligence action, plaintiff, David Wayne Dixon, sued Dr. Calvin R. Peters, who performed a hair transplant procedure on the plaintiff, and Duke University, where the procedure was performed. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, Duke University was granted a directed verdict. At the close of all the evidence, plaintiff, having tried the case on an informed consent theory, consented to the entering of a directed verdict in Dr. Peters’ favor on the issue of operative negligence. The question involving “informed consent” was submitted to the jury, and the jury…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ashe v. Radiation Oncology AssociatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Clark v. Sanger Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Crawford v. FayezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.