Legal Opinion

Shain v. Veneman

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided August 19, 2003No. 4:02-cv-40645Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

GRITZNER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Clerk’s No. 3). The Court first addresses the motion to dismiss. Having considered the motion, Plaintiffs’ resistance, a corresponding reply, documents related to amicus curiae briefs, and statements at oral argument, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, the Defendants’ alternative motion for summary judgment is denied as moot.

I. PROCEDURE

This case arises out of the construction of two sewage lagoon ponds near the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API