Farr Dev. Co. v. Thomas
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by the Earr Development Company against Samuel Thomas and another. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
The plaintiff in its complaint alleged that it was the owner and entitled to the possession of certain real property, described in its complaint by courses and distances, “more or less.” It then alleged “that the east boundary line of said real estate, prior to the acts of trespass by the defendants, as hereinafter specifically set forth, was and for more than fifty years immediately prior thereto has been marked by a certain fence, made of posts, wire, willows, hedge, and brush, which fence from time immemorial has been recognized, acknowledged, and acquiesced in as the true boundary line…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holmes v. JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Rydalch v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Young v. HylandUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Moyer v. LangtonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tripp v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Turner v. De PriestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Tanner v. StrattonUtah Supreme Court · 1914
- Anderson v. FautinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.