Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nicholson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an action in equity wherein by interpleas the rig'htful ownership of an attorney’s_ fee is sought to be determined.

The controversy arose in the case of Joseph Smith v. Frank C. Nicholson, et al., for damages for personal injuries. The facts disclosed are that on April 18, 1923, Joseph Smith was injured while in the employ of-defendant at their brick plant at Knobnoster, Johnson county, Missouri. In an attempt to adjust the claim for damages filed by Smith, it developed that defendants were protected by a policy of indemnity insurance issued by the IT. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wait v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Borgess Investment Co. v. VetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Taylor v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Yonge v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. City of Gallatin v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clyde Austin v. Texas-Ohio Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Walton, Jr. v. A.B.C. Fireproof Warehouse Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. OsbornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API