Legal Opinion

Seignious v. Limehouse

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 16, 1916Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Circuit decree follows:

The relator, George W. Seignous, seeks to enforce his rights by a writ of mandamus. The circumstances under which his supposed rights arise may be stated briefly as follows:

J. E. Bulwinkle was arrested by the sheriff of Dorchester while transporting in the nighttime in an automobile what was supposed to be contraband liquors.. The automobile was seized and sold at public outcry for the purpose of confiscating it. The said Bulwinkle had previously executed to the relator a valid mortgage of the car. The mortgage was duly recorded, it matured between the time of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Port Royal Mining Co. v. HagoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  2. Moody v. McKinneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  3. Martin v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  4. State ex rel. Snelling v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  5. Wilbur v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API