In Re Goodwin
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTION TO THE CONFIRMATION OF THE CHAPTER 13 PLAN, AS AMENDED OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO DISMISS THE DEBTOR’S PETITION (Doc. No. 33)
ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Bankruptcy Judge.
THE MATTER under consideration in this Chapter 13 case is a Motion described above filed by Peter and Sandra Prescott (the Prescotts). The Motion is based on the contention of the Prescotts that the Plan and the Chapter 13 Petition filed by Thomas A. Goodwin (the Debtor) were not filed in good faith, therefore, this Court should deny confirmation of the Plan and dismiss the Chapter 13 case…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens, Bankrupt. Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- William Neufeld, Creditor v. Susan K. Freeman, Debtor, and Emily Y. Wilson, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- In Re FelbermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re ToddUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re KurtzahnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006