Legal Opinion

Burton v. Tannehill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSublivax, J.

Trover by Tannehill against Burton. The facts vero that one Wermeag was indebted to the defendant *in error in the sum of $780, for which he had given his notes dated November the 28th, 1838, payable as follows, viz., $200, January the 1st, 1839; $100, June the 1st, 1839; $100, eight months after date; and $380, twelve months after date. To secure the payment of said notes as they should severally become due, he mortgaged to the defendant in error a wagon, six horses, &c. The mortgage contained a stipulation that the property should, “in the meantime,” remain in the possession of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robison v. HardyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  2. Lapp v. PinoverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API