People v. Blacknall
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the case remitted to Criminal Court, New York County, for further proceedings on the accusatory instrument.
Failure of the Trial Judge to include in the jury charge, as requested, the statutory definitions of “deprive” and “appropriate” (see Penal Law, § 155.00, subds 3, 4) was reversible error in this attempted larceny case. There is no requirement, as the Appellate Term found, that a “unique and difficult” larcenous intent issue be presented by the evidence before such amplifying definitions must be given.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. GainesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. MedinaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. CotterellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.