People v. Rush
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan D. Marrus, J.
This case presents an issue of apparent first impression in New York. In a criminal prosecution, can DNA evidence alone establish a legally sufficient case of a defendant’s guilt? While there appears to be general acceptance of the notion that DNA evidence alone can exculpate a defendant accused or *822even convicted of a crime,1 no reported decision in New York has determined that DNA evidence alone can inculpate a defendant sufficiently to support a guilty verdict.
Here the People commenced trial with a complainant who had been robbed and raped at knifepoint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. BethuneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roberson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- State v. SterlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- People v. RushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- State v. ToomesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- State v. AbdelmalikMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.