Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Studebaker's of Savannah, Inc. v. Tibbs

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1990No. A89A1964, A89A1965Published

1ConcurrenceCarley, Chief Judge

I cannot agree with Division 3 of the majority opinion. I find absolutely no evidence whatsoever to authorize a finding that appellant-defendant Carter was noticeably intoxicated when she was served the' last drink at appellant-defendant Studebaker’s establishment. The only evidence of her intoxication relates to points in time which were after she had been served the last drink, and there is considerable doubt whether that evidence would be sufficient to show her noticeable intoxication even at those later times. Noticeable intoxication is obviously manifested by a person’s outward…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sutter v. HutchingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Redmond v. BlauCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Professional Building, Inc. v. ReagenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Srochi v. KamenskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Whelchel v. Laing Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API