Lee v. Loveridge
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Labette District Court. Mrs. Lee sued Loveridge before a justice of the peace for-money loaned, and recovered judgment. The district court, at the July Term 1872, reversed said judgment, and Mrs. Lee brings the record here for review. The facts are stated in the opinion. 1. The judgment of the justice should not have been reversed.
Read the full summary
Error from Labette District Court. Mrs. Lee sued Loveridge before a justice of the peace for-money loaned, and recovered judgment. The district court, at the July Term 1872, reversed said judgment, and Mrs. Lee brings the record here for review. The facts are stated in the opinion. 1. The judgment of the justice should not have been reversed. No error is apparent upon the record; but if error existed, as alleged, it' was fully waived by subsequent appearance and answer. 2. If the overruling of the motion for continuance was error, it was not excepted to, and was consequently waived: Laws of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
Prudence Lee brought an action before a justice of the peace and recovered a judgment for $239.30. The defendant Lee Loveridge filed his petition in error in the district court to reverse such judgment and obtained a judgment of reversal. Plaintiff in error now prosecutes her proceeding in error in this court seeking a reversal of the judgment of the district court, and an affirmance of that of the justice. Two grounds of error were alleged in the petition filed in the district court. First, “that the justice erred in overruling a motion to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kœhler v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
- Small v. DouthittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
- Kykendall v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
- Grandstaff v. ScoffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
- Lalonde v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Atchison v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879